>>97339933>And most of them just happened to Republicans.
Let me guess, you don't think pretty much all democrats has taken donations from ISPs as well?
373 of 435 house members took donations from Comcast. Now ask yourself, why aren't the news and people mentioning the democrats that took such donations? They line up all the republicans but, the 265 of them but "conveniently" forgets all the democrats that took donations as well.
And that's just from Comcast.>>97340087
And again you ignore what I said and try to refer to another post when I already said the new laws and regulations will already do what people expect Net Neutrality to do right now>Which is why everyone is freaking out
Don't goddamn sugarcoat it, the reason people are freaking out is because they see the name "Net Neutrality" and make assumptions. Those things your referring to would still be illegal after the repeal.>Calm down dude
Tell that to everyone freaking out because people can't do a simple thing such as reading and researching about an issue before sperging out. At least I actually read the damn thing and know the actual potential risks, mainly loopholes, that this may have.