>>7585035>dating women tend to date men older than them which is why it makes sense when the roles are reversed.
It really doesn't, since is pretty subjective (at least for men). Not all men want to date women younger/older than them.
Also, most women (not all women, mind you) have daddy issues which can explain why they go for older man, is not because is mainstream or "hip" to date them but because they want a "daddy" or someone that resembles them.>height is the most influential factor
Again, is pretty subjective if you are talking about men, since there other guys that are tall and want a short girl to dom them.>Also, many animals involve larger / more dominant females than the males, the greatest examples being black widow spiders and spotted hyenas
Sounds fine, but human society is not "black widow spiders" or "spotted hyenas" society, we are not even in the same genetic family, so I don't see why you (or anyone for that matter) nature in the conversation, since more often than not, are unrelated to humanity.>Occupation and / or social experience
Again, what experience? and to add to the question, what occupation? Law, construction, sport racer? Is she more experienced socializing in general or with a selected social group like, rich people, delinquents, etc?>most sub guys would find it somewhat difficult.
Are you saying that, for one to be a sub, one must be a social retard or someone that can't be extroverted/introverted? (no /r9k/, being introverted does not mean being a social retard)>submissive to men is because most hetero couples consist of a taller and / or older guy and a shorter girl, so it makes sense why people would have those beliefs.
It's a bit more complex than just "girls are submissive to tallness", but I agree.>A short guy would be implicitly submissive to a tall girl
That's a generalization, not all short men want to be dommed, just like not all men like women that are "curvy" or "thicc", some prefer thinner or "sticc" women.