>>42609288>haha Christ, someone needs to go for a long walk and a cold shower :^P
What's wrong, can't provide a retort to any of my claims, so you have to resort to attacking the perceived tone of my argument? Do you know what a "logical fallacy" is? I'm guessing you don't, since you're a pseudo-science loving conspiracy theorist. I dare you try to respond to one of the claims I made, instead of just calling me angry and insisting that you're correct. Go ahead, I'll wait.>Also, maybe you'd like to go to their website where they list all the sources of their research? They consulted many studies before making these claims.
They consulted many studies in the same way that a middle school kid consults a bunch of Wikipedia pages while writing a history report. "Consulting" the work of real scientists and incorrectly and incompletely sourcing their work during the presentation of your own pseudo-scientific conspiracy theory doesn't mean you're doing science. If that "biohistory" bullshit is so true, then why doesn't it have its OWN studies, and why aren't there actual scientists supporting it? You clearly understand nothing about what science is or how it is conducted.>>42609311>Why did I do that? >read what I wrote before
What you wrote before was incoherent and didn't make any sense.>look at what those guys said, they must be Alex Jones fans n sheeit
All of this bullshit about present day testosterone levels and tempering with hormone levels in human populations is LITERALLY Alex Jones tier conspiracy bullshit.
Case and point: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ePLkAm8i2s>which means that this thrrad is for you, because, if you know so much about science, you should know how low your T is based on your behaviour. So read what OP wrote and start working inmediatly
Lmao there we go. So you ARE a believer in all this bullshit, and you were only responding to me the first time because you were buttblasted that I btfo'd all this bullshit.