Every one of his arguments fails.
Kalam argument: first premise wrong
Moral argument: all premises wrong
Ontological argument: completely incoherent, no terms are defined
The resurrection argument: Every statement false
Telological argument: just fine-tuning, debunked multiple times
I take this opportunity to remind you that Craig thinks faith is more important than reason. He also says no amount of evidence will change his mind. He also says that God did little children a favor by killing them. Even if his arguments (besides the resurrection one) were correct, it would lead to Deism instead of Theism.