Heavily sexualised by the media. Sexually favourable traits synonymous with this group are fair skin, fine (but not sharp like white womyn) features, servility, etc. Extremely high contrast in value compared to their male counterparts, hence all that angst from hapas and the like. Unconsciously or not, they absolutely know that white women are on top and they want SO BADLY to be like them. The closest they can get is by having a white SO, having a "white" child, or acting like them. >Black men
Another somewhat sexualised group. They're 4th not because they're not desirable, but because the top 3 do so well in the sexual market place. Probably the only men to do better than their female counterparts.>Brown women
Sexualised mostly in the exotic way. This group includes Middle Easterns, Indians, the swarthier South Americans, etc. Heavily simplified classification, but hey, that's how the world works.>Black women
Having dark skin as women is just unfortunate. But anyway this topic is about WMAF so let's focus more on that.>Brown men
Higher than Asian men, just BASED ON RACE ALONE, because at least they are depicted as more masculine.>Asian men
The lowest tier because of a combination of media depiction, cultural upbringing, and genetic factors such as generally lower heights and facial features that would look good on women but not on men (i.e. soft features). Most of us have it worse than anyone else on Earth when it comes to attracting a mate. This isn't me admitting defeat, it just means we have to work harder than anyone else. I can see where /r/hapas and pro-AMWF groups are coming from but acknowledging the reality is a necessary, albeit painful, part of making things work.