>>856837>get it through your head just because the mods gave you preferential treatment
You're absolutely an idiot. For one, I never participated in DJT threads, for two: Telling the users where to put their thread when prompted isn't "Preferential Treatment" and I look forward to the mental backflipping you will have to go through in order to justify it as such.
The users wanted a DJT thread, it wasn't allowed on /jp/ at the time, so it was put on /a/. Mods approved it, it stayed there. How the fuck is that 'preferential treatment'? Are you completely insane?>being a rule breaking thread doesnt mean you get to break the rules forever
It's not breaking the rules if the mods tell you to put it there.
By that logic, this thread is breaking the rules because /qa/ is not a meta board. Every thread on /qa/ is breaking the rules by that metric. /qa/ is specifically for that one question and answer thread that Moot and Hiro did ages ago, and everything since then has been 'breaking the rules'.
Except it's not, because this is where the mods told us to put meta shit. So you can pound sand.>too bad so sad that the best place for your thread now is int as deemed by the admins of current
As said by: Nobody, because the admins haven't spoke on the issue. They haven't done anything except delete the thread.
This gets under my skin because this was the same argument used to marginalize Quests, /asp/, and /aco/ material when those concerns were brought here. "Well they were legal once but now they're not too bad so sad :^)". It makes me think that there just exist a subset of brainless yes-men to any decision by the moderation staff no matter how nonsensical it might be.