>>13951994>Is true.Cool, so I'll just take that as you basing this opinion on your feelings cause you've most likely seen a couple of stories where the woman falsely alleged something, good to know you're totally not bias...
>In the past year, yes. In general, no.Again, no evidence for you to FEEL this way.
>You have no case then.Cool we agree...Never said anything about women having a legal case with no evidence.
>No. In one case, you know who did injustice but choose not to act, in the other you only find out later.The analogy used isn't focused on the knowledge of the perpetrator but the outcome you expect. In both cases no matter the time or the action people want justice not payback (unless the payback is in the form of justice).
>Tell that to all the people who were convicted without solid evidence just based on this retarded justice system where "muh feelz" decide about guilt, not evidence beyond reasonable doubt.Ok, so besides your heavy feelings about this subject you haven't provided any substance to your argument that ''Women are given a pass to cry rape YEARS after consensual sex has already taken place'' so let's put that to the test.
If this truly is a huge problem as you describe it you should have no issue in finding a report or study that states that a large percentage of rape allegations have turned out to be fake allegations.
INB4 posts some shit breitbart article or one anecdote.
