Migration complete - new scraper is in use and public backups will be made soon. RebeccaBlackTech merged into Desuarchive
Donations to the archive
would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives,
Threads by latest replies - Page 3
>a mere 40 years of state atheism completely destroyed all trace of 1000+ years of christianity in east germany Lmao, how did Christcucks get BTFO so hard here?
migration background =/= muslim
>>11613639 >The Bolshevik in question
lmao glad nothing this gay happened in north America
It's about to destroy all traces of German people as well.
Congratulation on being so destructive.
>>11613621 >tfw live in a red area
People really do get tremendously upset when you point out that Mohammed was a paedophile.
Why is this /his/?
He means it’s a shit argument that doesn’t disprove Islam. You can literally destroy it instantly. When asked is “Muhammad still perfect despite being a pedo?” They can just simply say yes. You’ll only stop fake liberal Muslims or Muslims that care more about their image more then their religion in their tracks.
You don’t have to choose a religion
>Another reason for a muslim to stay a muslim is political. Converting away from Islam doesn't make a racist accept you so you should never go out of your way for white acceptance
Also this is a retarded argument. The tribal /pol/ type race/religion politics have literally no bearing on the real world. Who cares if wignats accept you or not or any other schizophrenic online group?
We got a real evil and nefarious nigga over here
How is it projecting
>Alexander wasn’t Nordi-
That's a more recent depiction so it's probably less accurate than
Basically this, he was a manlet and he was described with light brown hair. I don't really see that as Nordic.
The funny thing is even the blonde in these mosaics that depict Alexander isn't even a nordic blonde. All of Alexander's physical features are Greek including the nose, short sature, etc.
Agreed, blonde hair does occur naturally in Greece too. It's a trait that is detected by the time of Anatolian farmer arrival and even more so after 2500 BC to 2000 BC Belle Beaker invasion. It's just not in huge numbers or a frequent trait.
Oh yes the noble birds and their curly hair
The Cold Winters Theory proposed by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen states that races living in cold dry climates have higher intelligence, while races living in warm humid climates have lower intelligence.
According to Allen-Bergmann's Rule, larger and rounder body shapes reduce surface area exposure and heat loss while increasing heat retention. So nonwhites such as Finns and Koreans have larger brains and higher encephalization, whiles whites have smaller brains and lower intelligence. Koreans have an average IQ of 107, while Finns have an average IQ of 104. On the other hand, whites have an average IQ of 100. Whiteness is just simply adaptations to survive in warm humid climes. According to Templer (2006), IQ correlates at -0.76 for mean high winter temperature, − 0.66 for mean low winter temperature, clearly demonstrating that the whiter you are, the less intelligent you are. According to Pesta (2014), temperature predicts IQ (and other well-being variables) within the 50 U.S. states. Colder U.S. states have higher income, higher IQ, less crime because they have more mongoloid traits.
seems white to me.
finno ugrics and baltics are not white
fuck off with your american race science bullshit
Then why did all the great civilisations like Rome edgypt Indus valley ect grow in the south while nordcucks were running around with sticks for 4000 more years
Even if they didn't it would still prove scientific racism, and I know your thread is a copypasta.
fuck off dumb american
we're not wh*te
like to Christians Muslims will say 'we don't have any popes, priests if u want to speak to Allah you can do at any time with no intercessor' 'Tawheed is simple and easy not complicated'
Yet no Muslim ever tells the Christian he MUST only speak to Allah at the 5 prayer intervals during the day, it's impermissible to make sujood any other time of day, his foot must be placed in a certain area or his prayer is not accepted, he must do wudu or prayer not accepted, he must face the ka'bah or prayer not accepted, if his prayer gets interrupted and he has to stop it's not accepted etc etc. He must only make dua in Arabic at prescribed times of day. Another example, Muslims will say 'we have one book only for everyone on earth, Qu'ran is for everybody' yet nobody tells the Christian he MUST learn Arabic and read the Qu'ran IN Arabic to get full benefit and understanding, he must learn tajweed or be seen as a lesser Muslim, if one letter is mispronounced he's disrespecting the Quran etc etc Clearly not simple, easy and straightforward. Yet in Christianity a man can simply drop to his knees or put his hands together at any time of day and speak to God in any language, any way he wants with no rules or timescales. there is so much detail in Islam i don't see why Muslims keep saying it's easy for any random joe on the street to begin practising.
It’s not forbidden there are other optional prayers you can do outside the mandatory ones
How did you mess up anon? You know that you can "repair" a prayer right?
>ie: you forgot shahada on the second rak'a
At the end of your prayer, you do two iditional soujouds while saying allahu akbar then do the shahada you missed
>ie: you accidentally added a 5th rak'a
Addition is better than division, you do as previously stated but don't do shahada and finish your prayer
Thats atleast how my father taught me and it seems more reasonable than resetting your entire prayer
You state this with utter convicion like it is fact when it's not. Anyone can research Assim AlHakeem, Sheikh Abu Khadeejah or any other pertinent scholar and they will tell you "it's not allowed to pray too early, it's best to pray no later than 15 mins after the allocated time as the prophet did", "and the curse is on one who prays 5 mins before the next prayer" etc etc, you can find this info openly and easily by looking up what popular Scholars have to say about all the stipulations around prayer. In fact go to
or some Sunni site and ask them if prayer is accepted when you keep getting interrupted by your child, when you didn't prostrate correctly, when you forgot some part of the surah you were reciting, there's all types of conditions and stipulations attached. No Sunni Salafi Muslim is saying "it's fine bro if you forgot, just do your best" it's always prayer is NOT accepted and must be stringently corrected. You talk like even fellow Muslims are lenient on prayer mistakes. THEY AREN'T.
You still don't grasp the point.
A Christian wants to pray and ask God for good health and a new house and forgiveness for a sin. The Christian can literally go into his bed and lay down, clasp his hands together and talk to God, no washing, no structured rigid routine, no feet and fingers placed in a certain way, not caring about the time of day. The Christian can jump out of his car in the middle of the highway if he wants and sit in the road and talk to God.
A Muslim CANNOT do this. The Muslim must look up a specific dua (always in Arabic) for the health, another specific dua for the house, another specific dua for forgiving the sin. These duas can only be performed at certain times of day with certain etiquette and never alongside the regular prayers. The Muslim cannot just prostrate in his bedroom and ask God for these things, he has to have a certain structure and mannerism implemented at a certain time and he can only make sujood during prayer
Here he confirms it, prostrating only for recitation and exceptional gratitude. Only two times
The fact that muslims have complicated rituals of prayer doesn't mean it has more value. Prayer is prayer, as long as it is genuine it gets the work done.
Do you also have complicated rituals when you take a shit? No you don't, you take a shit, clean your ass, clean your hands - that's it. As long ans it gets shit done, it's good. Often times simpler solutions are better.
Is Stalin unfairly vilified by Western historians? The Russians actually seem to like Stalin. And we all know the number of deaths in the "black book of communism" were bullshit. Heck, the Gulags only had a 5% mortality rate.
You say it like the oldest people are not the most positive about Stalin. Americans are silly.
It was a deliberate attempt to genocide the Ukrainian people, with the grain requisition policy being paired with both deportations and an attack on the Ukrainian intelligentsia and culture. Stalin prevented the emergence of a Ukrainian national movement, something he very much feared in the years prior to the famine's institution, by physically weakening the populace while simultaneously subjecting them to a series of measures intended to practically Russify them and which the Ukrainian peoples no longer had the energy to resist to any significant degree as a result of widespread starvation. As a result of Stalinist policies, Ukrainians were successfully ethnically cleansed from Kuban, where Ukrainians comprised 55% of the population in 1926 and 0.9% in 2002, and the rest of the Northern Caucuses in areas they had previously inhabited in bulk. The failure of Stalin to ethnically cleanse Ukraine, itself, was not from a lack of trying or intent. One only needs to analyze the context surrounding the famine to come to this conclusion.
>>11616488 >Ukrainians comprised 55% of the population in 1926 and 0.9% in 2002
That drop also happens to be linked almost entirely to the policies of Stain as the Ukrainian population had apparently already plummeted to 4% in 1959 according to Soviet sources.
A lot of countries officially recognise it is as a genocide.
Let's admire the human form like the mature adults of /his/ that we are.
>Let's admire the human form >ITT: a bunch of random paintings
It was 1942, and a young Jewish Slovakian woman named Helena Citronova was sent to Auschwitz. Helena was beautiful, and she was given one of the easiest jobs in a section of the camp nicknamed “Canada.” Helena’s job was to sort through objects that had been stolen from the Jewish families and to send the valuable items back to Germany. She could keep her hair long, and she was not in danger of being killed.
However, many people in her family had been killed in other parts of the camp. So she had a bitter hatred for the Nazis, just like every other prisoner. When a 20-year-old SS officer named Franz Wunsch tossed her a note that said, “I’m falling in love with you,” she immediately crumpled it up in disgust. Helena refused to even look at Franz. Despite her rejection, he continued to be friendly. He brought her extra food and protected her from the other guards. One day, Franz rescued Helena’s sister from being killed in the gas chamber and personally escorted her to live in the “Canada” section. The sisters were reunited, and this was enough for Helena to finally give him a chance. They began having an affair. When the war ended, they went their separate ways. However, Helena testified for his character when he went to court for war crimes and his life was spared.
How did the life of the average hunter gatherer compare to that of the modern wagie?
Can't wait for all the fucking love science goys to get the hell outta my planet
>>11612439 >Have you ever watched your 7 year old die from some horrible illness? How is that not an important part of life. How would that not scar you for life?
It doesn't scar tribal or even 19th century people as much as us. They have more offspring and it is expected that some of them die young, which is why parents would bond with their children only after a certain age, sometimes even name them only after a certain age.
My grandpa came from a serf family in lower Bavaria, which even at that time was just slavery light. His mother had 11 children, two of them died.
She was sad, sure but it didn't affect her the same way as a modern woman would be affected. What happened was expected and she had a lot of children to concentrate on.
It would impact you and it would be an important part of your life but it wouldn't "mark you" like a kid dying today. You would not only lose 2 of your children, you would lose 2 of your children, 3 of your siblings and 5 of your uncles and aunts, etc.
that man has life figured out
people dont like children
they literally kill them with abortion
dont go muh children and promote abortion at the same time it doesnt make any sense
Why did Britain never fall prey to communism during its history? Marx himself thought Britain was the ideal country for a communist revolution, and yet it never happened. This was despite Britain being one of the more left-wing countries in Europe, having massive workers movements both before WW1, before WW2 and post-WW2, having large support for nominally socialist parties (Labour) and even the Communist Party itself having some support. And yet British leftism always seemed to tend towards moderate social democracy rather than communism of any kind. Hell, British leftists don't even bother to oppose the monarchy or the House of Lords. What gives?
The main outlet for left wing movements has been the labour party. Which when created joined the British Communist party, the trade unionists and the Fabian's. It was the last one that seized control of the movement. Gradualist educated middle class types have steered the movement for a long time.
There was a communism movement in Britain during the 20th century. Upper class Anglos and lower class Jews made up the bulk of communist supporters. The communists in Britain outnumbered the fascist movement of the 1930's. No revolution occurred in Britain for the same reason it never occurred in the USA--there simply wasn't enough support for it.
There was only a window of 30 years that communist revolutions were a real prospect in the the west, and once Stalin died, the support for communism died with it to a large degree.
The farmers of Russia didn't want communism, they were opposed to it. That's why Stalin had them all killed or arrested when he came into power. They were termed kulaks.
Communism's main center of support is always among young, college aged bookworm types. 99% of them grow out of it at some point.
Because it already had a jewish ruling class.
>>11614423 >the party lost a lot of traction after the 1956 Hungarian events
Even earlier, in 1939, when the USSR signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and Stalin told all the international communists to stop antagonising Nazi Germany, and to justify the invasions of a bunch of Eastern European countries (e.g. Baltic States, Finland, Romania). The Winter War was an especially severe blow to the image of communism and the USSR (which until that point was looked on fairly positively by lower class people).
The USSR revealed itself to be just as imperialistic and hypocritical as the countries it claimed to oppose, and membership of the Communist Party dwindled, and its reputation hit rock bottom. Only the victory on the Eastern Front partly redeemed this.