>>29804022>I am actually surprised by that poll. Mostly favorable for women.
In the civil rights aspect maybe a slight advantage, but the poll shows most of /pol/ believe us to be inferior and a significant portion of them want our rights limited or appealed. I didn't add any reverse negatives because I spent a good week lurking and shitposting in any thread where woman or female was added to an OP, and particularly anything where a feminist decided to shitpost. It's possible some fractional minority thought women are superior but literally no one complained in the thread about the lack of option, and no other poster in every other thread had ever given me the impression anyone on pol held that belief. Ergo, a negative side, while fair, would have likely caused a counter productive shit storm. I agree for the poll to be fair it should have the negative sides more, but I wanted to obtain results and not instigate a huge parade of >op is implying female superiority because these options exist>>29805238>IRL people don't do that either, which is the problem.
how is it a problem if you are insisting our pride is an actual problem? either theyre both problems or theyre both not problems.>And as far as that other anon goes he was saying that /pol/ doesn't want to kill all gays, trannies, etc. Just the faggots. But that feeling extends to commies, snowflakes, etc for the exact same reason. So yes, even cis white hetero males.
And i am saying that based on the actual opinions given by people on that board when any of these subjects actually come up in conversation, it would be ludacrise to suggest anyone believe what you are saying since you are so more often likely to get the other answer even if you imply it is ironic.
Please poll your board if you expect anyone to take you seriously. This is a real black mark against your ability to reason with the left and moderates. >just the faggots
and for good measure, who decides where the line is drawn on faggotry?