>>29334005>assumption that you need monogamy in order to build an empire
It's a fact that used to be teached in history.
With strict monogamy you have one mother and one father devoting their main focus on their own families and their offspring they can be sure is theirs. Thus with this security one can establish a system of inheritance and a wish to enlargen said inheritance, be it materially or culturally. Modern liberal arts will call this working for your own descendants "divisive" and inheriting the works of your ancestors "privilege", or as Bezmenov said, this is what Soviet Russia did and failed really bad.
Not liking will not make it any less true: strict monogamy is how nations are made and sustained. Almost all empires had religions with explicit kill orders for adultery including Christianity.>climate
Europe is the one worst place in the world where empires could've been founded in, and it used to be even worse. People fight with nature and manage.>maids
Maid is an old word for woman. and the Bible spoke about what happens with decadence, that is, having more sexual partners and other things. The Chinese even explicitely cite this as the last step before the end of a " dynasty cycle". Dynasties end with polyamoury, and because of it.>not all humans
Absolutely correct. Not all human are baseline. We have trisomy, Huntington, allergies, and AIDS. Oh, let's not forget cancer.>staggering having sex
If your choice is shame for masturbation, death for adultery, or sleeping with the partner you chose (unique for Westerners, most other cultures had their parents decide), you had a very easy time choosing in the Middle Ages.
PS: promiscuity damages the neural regions designated for emotions.