Dude, I'm not contesting you claim to Twilight or anything, all I'm saying is that without any common consensus (even if it's implicit) of what constitutes a character the whole concept of claiming/stealing is meaningless. The most obvious and natural choice is canon. You've already been told by several people that Unicorn Twilight and Alicorn Twilight are the same character (as dictated by canon), but you still insist that the whole thread's consensus be dictated by your fantasy.
Without uniform character distinction this thread cannot function properly. If I have to stoop so low and actually explain it to you, my claim was a jab at your doctrine. It was claim of "Random Twilight-like character copy #5243" as opposed to your claim of "Random Twilight-like character copy #3757", both of which aren't mutually exclusive and of which neither is the real Twilight, because under this mode of operation one can never be sure.>I don't care for wish fulfilment waifu fantasies otherwise.
It means I don't give a fuck about who you waifu or what you're doing with it, it's none of my business. All I'm saying is respect rules of the thread game - what constitutes a character/claimable entity isn't up to you to decide, but to the general consensus which is currently dictated by show's canon I may of course misjudged on thread's consensus here, but seeing as it's only you insisting on those two being different I think I described it perfectly
. There is no Unicorn Twilight and Alicorn Twilight claims - there is only single Twilight claim.
For a twifag, you don't seem very smart or concerned with rules. I guess it's true what they say that opposites attract.