You are not dumbing anything down. You are clarifying what you said by adding additional information. >Looks have nothing to do with it
That is the present tense you are implying that looks don't matter when they clearly do in the present. >if the average "man" did not believe in the delusion of women's rights...then looks would no longer be a major factor in the way foid animals select their partners.
That's not what you said in your original post > You buy into the idea that a foid has "rights"? You get culled out of the gene pool.
In your first post you clearly phrased it in such a way that any reasonable person would interpret it as meaning that male's individual attitude towards women was a detriment to their success with said women while in your clarification you get away from that and imply a more broad cultural attitude towards women held by men is the the reason for the lack of success of the average man.
Also we live in a civilized society by any metric and women have sexual and economic freedom so you are just wrong .