>>125583767,67>A statement that contradicts yours interconnects with it by negating it.How are you still missing something so simple? The whole of the math problem is irrelevant to the conversation. I'm trying to talk about the orange on the counter, not the apple in my hand. Bet you thought I just made that randomly, huh.
>Only if p is equal to zero (since n^0 is 1 for all positive n)Save for it doesn't equal zero, it equals ∞.
>concerning your reasoning abilityYou're right, but as I've stated many times over, one false claim does not negate all other claims.
Especially when they are about the apple and the lime and have nothing to fucking do with the orange. All information is stand alone. If you can test and support the other claims independent of the limes and apples, which you can do, then there is no way the orange is wrong. You
can not claim everything a person says is wrong based on one wrong statement. For instance, if I said I had pear in my hand instead of an apple, I would still be correct in my assertion that the orange is on the counter, and the two statements have nothing to do with each other and there is nothing that can prove my statement about the orange incorrect, even if I am wrong about the apple in my hand by calling it pear.
>My direct claim was that I did not put much stock in your ideasWhile quoting a line about what kind of poster you are. Backpaddle harder.
>How does the fact that you die without a heart prove that hearts are of unequal value?You're creating a false dichotomy in that the "1" (heart) can be separate from the person and still maintain a 1:1 ratio. The 1:1 ratio is dependent on everyone having a 1 (heart). You're forgetting that "heart" in this allegory is not a physical thing. It's just the symbolize for 1 is the ratio. By removing it from the person you no longer have a 1:1 ratio, you have a 1/xi1 ratio. Because not everyone has a heart at that point. The hearts not "worth less" you just removed it from the equation.
>>125583767,68>Why do they all have value one?Did you not read the word relative?
It's relative in the fact that everyone must have one. The "specific" value is immeasurable so the only way to quantify it is to give it a relative value. Which in this case is 1, due to the fact that everyone must have one.
>death, coma, and brainwashing.Death, no. Coma and brainwashing, yes. In death all mental activity stops, thus you lose your
opinion.In a coma you still have thought, thus you still have your opinion. In brain washing you still have an opinion. It's not removed, it's just replaced. You still have the same relative amount.