>>63104698Yes/no and yes. Humans and beastmen in Fantasy have a weird relationship. They can breed (almost always in the form of rape), and children can be born from humans as beastmen, or with beastman features, for seemingly no reason. Those children were normally left in the woods, like changelings, where they'd either die or get taken in by beastmen.
The "shitting everywhere" is correct, but it's not the whole story behind it. They're supposed to be the inverse of humanity: Man has ingenuity, beastmen can't make anything themselves; men create, beastmen destroy; men are gods-fearing, beastmen hate the gods; men are clean, beastmen are unclean. So on and so forth. It's also why they rape so much. Men have loving relationships and spouses, beastmen can know no love.
It ties into why I asked the original question of how they differ in AoS. While I love the look of beastmen, and I get the concept behind them, they just come out being really one-dimensional. What's the point if they don't have any goals or aspirations beyond "pitch a fit and ruin everything"? They have no free will, they're dominated completely by Chaos, and the only semblance of personality they're really given is "This one was kinda' clever", or "This one looks different".
>>63104859>furshitteryHave you never seen an ungor?
