Donations to the archive would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives, discuss here.

No.16405642 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>conquers entire planet in the span of like 300 years
>decides to just give it all up and stop breeding
Why are they like that?
72 posts and 4 images omitted

No.16405780 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
How many guys got shot in the dick during WWII?
7 posts omitted

No.16395192 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
ITT: poorly aged propaganda posters
136 posts and 49 images omitted

No.16407203 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Read this post, you will understand that I am right. Buddha and Jesus. The world would tell you, oh if one of them is correct the other one can't be. False. Buddha never talked about God. In fact, Mahayana Buddhism says a Buddha-to-be, a Bodhisattva, should not worship "strange gods". Sounds familiar? Yes. Because Buddhism is basically just a form of religion that doesn't rely on God, but on Buddhic understanding, to achieve salvation from this world. Does Buddhism and Mahayana Buddhism specifically contradict Christianity? Nope. It doesn't, I have read plenty of it's texts both Theravada and Mahayana. The Mahayana specifically never says there is no God, and, says Buddha is not the supreme spirit that created the world but the Dharmakaya. What is that? It is the self of all things. So, can God and the Dharmakaya both exist, without contradiction? Let's look at the other side. Does Christianity contradict Mahayana Buddhism? Does Christianity for example say, there is no self? Nope. Does it say everything is permanent? Nope. Does it even say, Christianity is the only true religion? Not at all. I get that Hinduism is wrong, since it's paganism and has weird rituals involving cow dung. But Buddhism is a different thing than that. And remember the words of Buddha, not to worship strange gods as a Bodhisattva. Both religions synergize, and did you also know that the Holy Spirit forbade the Apostles to preach in Asia? I want to know why.. because perhaps Buddhism, which was already present in Asia at that time, is a true religion, and not contrary to the Gospel? Perhaps. Tell me what you think.

No.16407077 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Super human vs subhuman
51 posts and 2 images omitted

I can't take French nordicism seriously

No.16403395 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
They speak a latin language, draw a large part of their culture and habits from Rome, drink wine and more often than not are brown or dark haired except in some regions
Even the muh celts cope doesnt work because La Tene Celt where celtic gauls stemmed from clustered with southern french, north Italians and Iberians
The truth is that Gaul has always been part of the mediterranean world in fact even before the roman conquest.
French who seethe on southern europeans at this point are no better than Mexican who do so except that at least the latter have the excuse of not looking entirely similar to the people that give them their culture and language
38 posts and 11 images omitted

No.16406910 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Why do so many deities have the personality and values of a vapid BPD whore? Who is this even meant to appeal to?
5 posts and 1 image omitted

No.16407190 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Thinking about Nazi Germany again and what could have been.

No.16405900 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
>Jesus spends his whole life telling people to love and forgive
>Gives several stories about grace
>Explains how through merits, everyone would fall short

>Somehow, Catholics got from this that Salvation is based off of works (Make sure to pay the Church to get into heaven. No refunds tho.)
7 posts and 1 image omitted

Bison domestiation

No.16404065 View ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
I've never heard a convincing answer as to why North American natives never domesticated Bison. Their range spans areas where there was settled agrarian civilization, such as Cahokia, so why didn't the natives there bother domesticating them? The only reason I've heard is that they're too big and aggressive, but the exact same could be said about cattle's wild ancestor, yet people in Eurasia were still able to domesticate them.
80 posts and 10 images omitted