Using the word god there is bound by the baggage of everything else that implies god: to be worshiped, to be persona, to care about humans, to have a goal, to have a domain, and so on.
So, revising what you have defined:>must be eternal because it was never caused>all powerful to create something like the universe out of nothing>sentient to make the decision to create the universe
including the soft limitation that is>Outside of that I know nothing [about it]
there is nothing that points towards a random god of theism. This sounds more like pandeism or an idea along those lines.
In fact, the description you use about this, (placeholder word =) entity, is so distant to what people refer to when they claim god, that by simply defining it you may as well have created a new nameless "god", unrelated to all other existing gods.