>>64982792>unanimatedThat's the key. When does something start being life? If you build a machine AI that perfectly, millimetrically imitates human behaviour and learning patterns, is it life? If you say no, then why? What makes life, actually 'life'?.
If they put silicon-based life as super mighty beings with gigantic technology and intellect, it's unreasonable to think they never tried to experiment with other elements and the possibilities they might have. Especially if they're around the entire Milky Way.
If we carbon-based life can contemplate the possibility of silicon-based life, there's a enormously high chance that silicon-based life as advanced as described in MLA would have already contemplated carbon-based life, and even experimented with it.
If not, they don't even have the same definition of 'life' and Superior learning human language to communicate was just a red herring and unaccurate.
