>>277149675>yes everyone knows 90% of naruto filler sucks. 5% is mediocre. But 5% is really good and fun. Naruto robot episode? THAT'S FUN. Kakashi mask episode? THAT'S FUN. but not all of the slice of life episodes or scenes are filler. sometimes it's from the manga. and those are good too.You generalizing with "le Fun" can also be applied to One piece arcs like Foxy, which were peak comfy.
>cell sagaGoku had to finish off Cell twice. Goku came back and finished everything off, Gohan's efforts were worthless, he even had to help gohan with the final kamehameha or he would have lost.
>god of destruction sagaEveryone literally had to hand it to Goku and he handled Beerus.
>u7 vs u6 sagaIf you include this then your complaints about One piece are void since other characters defeat villains besides Luffy.
>zamasu sagaThe fucking Zeno button? Wow your counterarguments are jokes.
>some bankais in bleach suck. But most characters that unlock their bankais are hype. So it's not ichigo alone that gets the attention.Luffy doesn't get all the attention either.
> There is nothing in One Piece as hype as Unohana's bankai.In your opinion.
>I don't have a hate boner. I used to love watching dubbed one peice on TV when I was a kid (10/11/12 years old) and I watched the first 150 episodes or so. But when I finally gave one piece a shot as a grown up (700+ episodes) I realized that it's complete ass.>There is always a facade of things happening in one piece. but nothing ever happens. Oda is too much of a pussy to deviate from his Alabasta formula. One Piece canon feels like fucking filler for god's sake. One Piece can literally be a 500 chapters manga with a complete story. But most of it is Alabasta snooze fest. Do Flamingo was hyped for hundreds of episodes. And when we finally got to his 100+ episodes arc, it turned out to be the worst arc in all of one piece. Complete Dressrosa dogshit. Another worse version of Alabasta.This alabasta buzzword argument is shit.