>>253675062>But it has with how he behaves around her.not love. i win.
>Does the wikia even have all transcripts?whether it does or not you will not find anything that proves link loves ilia. even if you did it would be the opinions of a third party. i win.
>Link behaves exactly like Illia in the sceneno he doesnt. all he does is smile. i win.
>How many times will you ignore the obvious?i win.
>You don't have points.i have one and i have stated it like 10 times now. i'll reiterate it here once again. link doesn't engage in romance. he never does no matter what game it is. link always ignores romance.
>obvious framing of romanceto show that ilia likes him, yes. not him liking her.
>your argumentation is inconsistenti have one point.
>jumps from "there's nothing there" to "what's the problem with implied romance"there is never romance on link's part. that is my only point and only argument. my problem isnt the existence of implied romance, it is with you demanding that implication (which, again, is only ever one sided) MUST require some sort of payoff at the end OR ELSE
>You hardly spelled a word right this entire conversation.im not esl though. i can spell however i want. you are esl and occasionally that fact slips through in your grammar. i find it funny, that's all.
>I can't express human relationships and feelings to youif your argument is that "the magical law of human relationships and feelings and intimacy demand that this romance i invented in my head blossoms into on screen love" then i'm sorry to have to say it but i win.
