>>6412996Truth about a fetish that didn't even technically exist by name until a year or two ago?
For the record I wasn't disagreeing with you; I agree normally proportioned short women are not shorstacks, but the image is STILL bullshit for other reasons. This is easily one of the most recently to be established fetish crowds on /d/ and some random yahoo coming along and saying "THIS IS SHORTSTACK, THIS IS NOT SHORTSTACK, THATS IT!!" based on personal preference is total bullshit.
At any rate image limit reached; meaning this whole debate is pointless since it will be ignored with no more fap material coming in.