>>87232593>Yeah the royalty free codec consortium is paying me to shill for their codec...Yes, royalty free means nothing to the consumer, but would save millions for corporations making it worth their while. Also I've never implied actual paid shilling outside of offhanded comebacks. The narrative and media buy-in alone is enough to get the useful idiots going.
>without having to worry about patent holders suing me.They won't LMFAO, what is this fud. Did you know that patent coalitions have been trying to sue google for av1? It's pretty much impossible for the average patent holder to sue, the financial risk reward of suing even megacorporations pretty much makes the whole thing a nonstarter.
>The only existant codec with better compression is VVC, and that was published less than two years ago.Yes, both google and mpeg codecs are released in different intervals and have no generational equivalent.
>No one said AV1 was opus or jpeg xl.Look up the thread, they just did.
>What is this about Jews?Jewry has a very explicit meaning on /g/, yes predating the election before you start whining about the /pol/.
>patented encoding tools for freeI don't see how this relates to my actual point. Do you understand what the phrase "higher order implication" actually means?
>Book burning torrents?As the creator of certain torrents you are allowed to retroactively delete certain torrents from the index, severely gimping discovery. The holy war being waged here would be by the av1 discord troons saving le epic royalty free codecs marvel style in the false name of freedom.
>>87232672>How does AV1 kill nyaa?See my last point. I'm assuming that's what the discuck user is trying to do of course, see
>I'm already updating all my anime and movie releases to AV1Where updating on nyaa usually means overriding (and deleting) existing torrents for any reason.
>>87232700discord tryhard "meme" meta is so jarring next to imageboard banter
