>>12680932>10% lessnope, Northern Europeans range from 10-15% WHG, with outliers like Balts reaching 25%.
>we provednope
You keep posting numbers which show there is a range of variation in ancient Romans where their range is 30-40% CWC, which is substantially higher than modern Meds.
Its actually Central European levels of CWC.
As an average they are 1% less steppe, but their range of steppe DNA shows they can reach Central and North European levels of steppe being upward of 40% CWC.
>less steppeagain you are taking a total average while picking only a small group of Meds, Med average is actually lower, Greeks, Spaniards, and Italians taken as a collective, and if we are being memetards, MENA living along the Med coast, are all less steppe than Ancient Roman average, not to mention many ancient Romans had significantly more steppe.
>liesyou do this everythread, you misunderstand the data then call anyone who tries to explain to you a liar.
You are too stupid to interact with this field.
>Northern Europeans are 20% averageshow me the numbers, you cant even manipulate vahaduo to get Northern Euros to 25% WHG.
Only Balts have that much, typical North of the Alps Europeans are 10-15%, with 15% being more common in Ireland/Scotland/Scandinavia.
having 10% WHG is absolutely within the range of Northern Europeans.
10% WHG and 40% CWC, that is literally the profile of a Belgian or a German.
>most are less steppeactually most are more steppe.
It is a handful of outliers going as low as 20% steppe that drag down the average.
and even then the average is only 1% lower than modern Meds.
A plurality of ancient Romans had MORE steppe DNA than Meds.
