>>63529838>>63530036>>63530508Between video evidence from the same battlefield(!) of 100 times smaller and more erratic targets hit - and witnessing
>>63530515,
>>63530623 happen hundreds of times, Otto's claim is completely credible (the whole book is essential /k/, well worth a read frens).
>the scale of WWII was sufficient for all sorts of statistical anomalies to occur>The IL-2 was large, underpowered, and operated by some of the worst "pilots" ever allowed to take flight - flying more or less straight and level at 100-300ft AGL + ~130kn; an ideal target>open terrain maximizes tank engagement window 