>>42268949Why not pick both? We can counter stealth, but our enemies can't.
>>42269068In the same universe where Russia operates the most advanced ECM systems with thousands kilometers range, real time satellite guidance systems, virtually unjammable radars and best IRST.
Besides that, ahead of whom? Russian systems can negate the effects of stealth technology, but most importantly Russia has nukes to defend itself against any overwhelming attack, meaning that it can focus more on actually realistic scenarios like what we have in Syria, where stealth actually might have some real utility against obsolete technologies.