Donations to the archive would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives, discuss here.
Planned network provider replacement will occur with downtime the entire day of 2/16 or 2/17.
On these archives
On these boards
Your latest searches
Capcode
Show Posts
Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts
Post Type
Results
Order
Anonymous
[209 / 61 / 79]
588KiB, 586x628, saint benitez.png
View SameGoogleImgOpsiqdbSauceNAO

California AWB overturned - Miller v. Becerra

Anonymous No.49541836 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>49541883 >>49541902 >>49541967 >>49542000 >>49542093 >>49542158 >>49542200 >>49542459 >>49542853 >>49543011 >>49543123 >>49543640 >>49543671 >>49543695 >>49543786
>JUDGMENT. Following a bench trial and the Courts Decision in this matter dated June 4, 2021, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs. 2. California Penal Code §§ 30515(a)(1) through (8) (defining an assault weapon by prohibited features), 30800 (deeming certain assault weapons a public nuisance), 30915 (regulating assault weapons obtained by bequest or inheritance), 30925 (restricting importation of assault weapons by new residents), 30945 (restricting use of registered assault weapons), and 30950 (prohibiting possession of assault weapons by minors), and the penalty provisions §§ 30600, 30605 and 30800 as applied to assault weapons defined in Code §§ 30515(a)(1) through (8) are hereby declared unconstitutional and shall be enjoined.


https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.casd.642089/gov.uscourts.casd.642089.115.0.pdf
×