>>39002769Thus, factually, regardless of & unable to be changed by social constructs - whether or not the actual word changes - you are a member of the same species as I, or at the very least you are closer to my genealogy than that of a frog. We have now established a fact that is not merely a data point or one given interpretation of it. Geneology tests will produce data points that cannot be interpreted in any other way, too; rather, they will produce results that unambiguously define you as 'Not a frog'. If taxonomic classifications are social constructs, given that evolution is a gradual process and our definitions are 'technically' arbitrarily decided, then you would be obliged to refute this and argue that you could theoretically, in some interpretation, count as a frog.
