>>13547766I wasn't dunked, it the same crap I've heard a million times before
>Y-y-you're just narrowminded!>>13547807WWI weapons and armor aren't my forte.
Most deaths were from artillery and explosives, the helmets are certainly needed.
As for the armor, I feel that metal armor would of slowed them down a bit which would be a bit difficult to get to cover quickly.
There was something lighter, I believe
>>13547834Everything, I really wouldn't call them "adults".
Especially that shitty comedian you posted.