>>4672209>They're the ones who consistently ignore very grounded feedback for yearsThey aren't supposed to take your feedback on the IRC though?
>ban people who make them look bad on IRCAgain, IRC is not for that, another thing is, is your problem with jannies or actual mods.
If your issue is with jannies and you come there crying about mods then you will look like a moron in their eyes.
>accept most any random ban request from janitors who have no idea what they're doing, That's as explained before is likely due to their limited number.
How many mods do you think there are, and how many shitposts and reports do you think happen per minute.
You can't give each of those an equal and fair judgement.
>ban people on /qa/ when they start pointing out how bad moderation is (only mods can moderate /qa/, no janitors)Interesting, thanks for the info. I haven't been posting on /qa/myself so I can't comment on the state of things there.
>and knowingly refuses to accept logically plotted ban appeals.I have doubts about this. I'v had some of them lift my bans even though I wasn't asking for a ban appeal, simply because they though my case was bullshit and I shouldn't have been banned.
I would be interested in seeing one of those logically plotted ban appeals, to see if I agree or disagree myself.
> Based on what I've seen over a decade, nearly everything they do is based on personal preference, not what is good for topical discussion. Hard to comment on this part since there is a lot of subjectivity on the matter.
>They are their own worst enemy, along with the shitposters who have made their home here over the years.Dunno, seems to me if some people werent legit mentally ill. We would have no need for mods or jannies.
You may not like the police man because they give you a speeding ticket, but we need them because some people are just literal retards and reckless drivers, or they want to burn down the neighborhood thread because they feel upset today.
