>>4674209>>actually defending jannies and modsI'm not defending jannies. I'm defending mods.
>>actually defending handing out bans based on number of reports and not whether or not a post broke any actual rulesAnon think othe logistics and cost and not like a child that wants a utopia. Yes, we would want payed, proffessional mods to review each thread and post with all of the context for the correct judgement.
Now if you leave commie land where everything just magically happens because you want it.
You realize there is thousands uppon thousands of shitposts constantly. So it would either require a huge staff and thus huge amount of money.
Or youd get lots of biased faggots who would quickly subvert things to their own ends with no end in sight.
You can stomp your feet all you want and dream of a perfectly moderated internet you want. But the moment you think about how do you implement it and run it in a resources balanced manner your childish delusion falls apart.
Real world has always the question of cost of implementation. Which you seem to forget.
>>actually being retardedthe irony is always so bright.