This image was cause for a ban for global rule 3, and was THE ONLY ONE IN THE THREAD to be deleted.
https://boards.fireden.net/tg/thread/47108901/#47118925This image, posted by a different anon, was totally fine.
https://boards.fireden.net/tg/thread/47108901/#47188942Please explain precisely in what way the former image broke global rule 3 and the latter did not. Please draw a line. Please teach me how to avoid being banned for actions that are evidently not against any rules unless I'm the one doing them.
>don't break rulesIt is impossible to follow a rule that is unknown.
The sequence of words written on the rules page does not accurately describe which images are bannable and which aren't. Empirical observation of the mods' decisions only suggests that the content of the image itself is not important.
As it stands, different people are treated differently for doing the exact same thing. Once the mods have a grudge against an IP address, they will ban that IP address on sight simply because they can.
I don't even remember what I did to start this grudge.
If my actions are irrelevant to my punishment, what incentive do I have to change them?
>moderation is inconsistent, what else is newA rule that only applies to people the mods don't like is useless and more damaging than no rule at all.
Please consider clarifying the written rules, so that anons can tell when they're going too far and have the option to restrain themselves.
I find it disgusting that you take pride in such an inevitability and openly encourage it, instead of promising to mitigate it as best you can, even if you really won't.
>complaining is against the rulesYou're not giving me much of a choice, and this issue affects many people.
>you can leaveI already have. Please explain the rule anyway, for the benefit of others.