>>3335186scenario A: a few people get banned, some rightfully so for using spambots, link to circlejerk is pasted in to funnel all relevant users away from /qa/ the vast majority of which were never rangebanned
scenario B: a few people get banned, some rightfully so for using spambots. there is no 4chanx link to a circlejerk, most relevant people continue to post on /qa/ as usual as they don't use spambots and don't get rangebanned.
unfortunately we experienced scenario A, and now people like this
>>3333959 boast about the "success" of pissu at the expense of /qa/. half tempted to start posting some embarrassing archives. so shameless.
