>>3440356>and I've seen you posting frogsYou know this how? I'm quite interested to hear how you're able to view posting histories based on a poster's diction.
>I don't oppose any particular patterns of postingI don't know, it seems you're quite opposed to frogs as you've attributed schizophrenic traits to those who post them.
>as long as it isn't forced, and soijak isn'tLeftovers from /tv/ that are repurposed into blunt weapons and are routinely deleted by staff aren't organic, so I'd say soijak is being forced on here and for very petty reasons. Notice how the spam flies into action whenever something a spinoffer would find objectionable pops up. Like meta threads or politics or k-pop...
