>>60911871>>60911906some were under the same interpretation as the guy spamming even before Mountlear tried clarifying, but like
>>60911938 said, it really doesn't matter whether or not the implied "cheating on your gf" plot point holds any merit, because even if you choose not to accept that as your own personal "canon," it's still right there in the story. twice, even. even another writefag chimed in and asked for peace, then immediately agreed that it's off-topic. that general is cursed
