>>3984322Not him, but I would say it's PLAUSIBLE.
First, check this web page.
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-dataThen, consider this study, that was financed by the government to figure out how effective VAERS was at capturing all incidents.
https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdfWith less than 1% of all adverse reaction reported, it is plausible that you can take all VAERS reports and multiply them by a hundred. I say plausible, because some reactions are more likely to get reported and more people are likely to know about VAERS now than before, but it's up to doctors to submit reports.
So, as of now, that's 588,800 possible deaths. In less than a year.
In 2020, there were 568,000 excess deaths, I got that from the CDC's mortality statistics for the whole year and subtracted 2019. About 500,000 of them were counted as COVID deaths by the end of December. A COVID death is ANY death regardless of co-morbidity of a person that had tested positive up to 28 days earlier.
However, one must consider that the diagnostic test most countries are using to determine if someone has COVID and thus is a COVID death (usually based on this:
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/protocol-v2-1.pdf) has an absurdly high false positive rate. Could be as high as 94% (per the CDC only 6% of COVID deaths are COVID-alone, and the mortality rates by age group are very similar to mortality in general at old age). The false positive rate varies a lot because there are some deviations from the test adopted by the WHO, in terms of number of cycles and how samples are obtained.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JcJybryNB0xX/Even without accounting for false positives, the 4 vaccines were already plausibly worse. So what were the other excess deaths then? They were most likely killed by missed medical treatments coupled with the extreme stress felt by everyone that year.
