>>140608747Even if any of that was true, that would not prove that they had a "brain closer to the opposite sex" but rather that there is no man/woman brain since it can show up in both.
If you see a neural trait that is typically seen in women, in a male brain, a rational person would not conclude that they're looking at a female brain, but rather that the neural trait is not exclusive to women, and just more common in them.
It's literally proof against the idea of a male/female brain.