>>125626562>With fictional technology? Yes. Yes it does.When this same technology cant be used again or fails when used by someone other than Batman, it is bad writing.
>A fictional concussive grenade functioning on fictional science against a character who has fictional powers. Applying logic here or acting like it's a bad plan is ridiculous.You are acting as if verossimilitude and realism are the same thing.
Using the grenade example (this one is fun because it was military level grenades), when a specific item works only when Batman is involved but fails when a normal villain uses the same tactic it fails verossimilitude.
I.E: If a tactic is solid it should work when someone on the same level and above than Batman tries it. Otherwise it just bad writing.
>Nothing you have said relates to what I said and using 'bad writing' when discussing his technological capabilities is absurd. Again, I said that is bad writing because is something that is not replicable by other characters and works only when ignoring the basic abilities of the enemies.
Again, the requirements that I posted dont even mention that he is not using tech. Just a specific tactic that is actually good and take in consideration the abilities and capabilities of enemies.
The fact that many of Batman plots relies on Deux ex machine to win just proves that it should not be taken in consideration.
Take the justice buster. It has super reflex to be able to deal with the flash and a super goey to fuck the ground. Sounds super good right?
Except that it ignores the speed force. If some flash villain tried the same bullshit he would lose. But Batman wins because somehow flash was unable to use his ´´optimal speed´´ against him and let himself get hit.
In resume: bad writing to make batman look good, ignoring enemies capabilities.
