>>34411493Because "alternate animatics" haven't happened since The Crystalling.
I suppose nobrony must be buying "G5" leaks even on /mlp/ anymore if it's come to this, but... seriously, "way back in 2009"? "Unreleased episode ideas"? "CONCEPT ARTS" several years after we got truckloads of them officially? Is this fandom (aka "the same leaker" because even that part has become conspicuously self-insistent in the recent months) even trying anymore?
And this being 2019, I reckon they had to heroically break into Goldner's home PC hard drives where all the aforesaid stuff is conveniently gathered in one place. Roll over, Daring Do.
(And seriously, how is the production material thief from two years ago still called a "leaker" even here by EQD staff? Leaks come from sources that had official access themselves; the S8 debacle, as even the show staff pointed out in plain terms, dealt with stolen materials. And those who did it back then still deserve to be fined into a good while of instant noodle diet)
>What are you even complaining about?If you're asking for a TL;DR, then bronies. What else do I usually complain about? You must be new here.
>I just think that if someone is going to say something, they should have a pointThe point is the same one I've reiterated here for ages as far as data thefts, "leaks" and related terminology have been discussed. Especially as this article itself reports on the same old story with different - and escalatingly more ambitious-sounding - variables.
