>>36641353We should have an informational sticky like the olden days, including:
1. Don't feed the parasprites
-- this is by far the biggest problem of board culture that we face now, because we have a smaller population and one bad actor can cause a lot of preventable chaos that would have been drowned out in the past
2. Any rules that aren't in writing on the actual /mlp/ rules page
-- preferably just remove those informal rules in the first place so moderation can focus on real issues
And that's it.
>>36641373Tulpa threads should be unbanned, but on the condition that it doesn't become a /soc/ thread for tulpas and their hosts. In other words, the thread should be about tulpas as an abstract concept, not a social nexus where twenty different pony tulpas rp together. The tulpa community is a fairly tight-knit one, so you have to be very serious about keeping the avatarfagging and "rp" (I know it's not actually rp when your tulpa is talking but it's indistinguishable from the outside and causes the same issues) to a minimum. Keeping things somewhat impersonal will insulate the thread from the drama that such a thread might bring. Otherwise you risk having a mini ponychan right here on the board where there's next to no anons, only tripfags. To be fair, the tulpa community has created a lasting niche on discord and the like, so the autism definitely won't be as concentrated as it was in the early 2010s and it's likely to be much more on topic. Tulpafags without pony tulpas can just go somewhere else and ought to be encouraged to do so.
basically, just moderate the tulpa thread as if it were any other thread and punish stuff that looks like rp or avatarfagging.
t. a tulpafag partly responsible for the rise of underground /mlp/ tulpafags