Quoted By:
So you have all of these people giving in and catering to black people andor "#BLM", because black people andor "#BLM" protestors andor rioters protested andor rioted against whatever they feel like labeling as "racist" for no reason at all.
Their definition of "racist" is supposedly that it is seen as unfavorable and against black people, so that makes it "racist".
There's prejudice of everything everywhere. In the case, why not ban everything that's a stereotype in the whole world? May as well have everyone wear black sheets over their bodies, and not identify as any age, gender, race, religion, and stuff. And if there's no such thing as "race", and "only one race the human race", then "racist" does not exist, it would be "ethnicist".; I suppose that doesn't have the same impact, so they continue to use "racist". You also have black rappers and black comedians that are racist, prejudice, etc., wear white face, etc.. Dave Chappelle does that. Nobody talks about that!! And everyone loves and support them. Is it because he's black? Is it only cool and okay if black people do it? Then that is racist.
Another argument I hear is "oh it's like this meme I saw where someone has a scratch on their leg and someone else has a broken leg and people pay attention to the scratch on the leg when you need to pay attention to the broken leg so we need to pay attention to the broken leg because black lives matter". Then, since white people are so neglected, we need to not pay attention to black people, we need to pay attention to white people, because white lives matter. I suppose saying "all lives matter" and "all lives matter is not racist" would be out of the question.
"white lives matter" and "black lives matter" is the definition of racist in the context that is is judging by race. "all lives matter" is still called "racist", despite being the definition of not being racist, or any prejudice, since it does not judge by race, or anything. Irony FTW.
Their definition of "racist" is supposedly that it is seen as unfavorable and against black people, so that makes it "racist".
There's prejudice of everything everywhere. In the case, why not ban everything that's a stereotype in the whole world? May as well have everyone wear black sheets over their bodies, and not identify as any age, gender, race, religion, and stuff. And if there's no such thing as "race", and "only one race the human race", then "racist" does not exist, it would be "ethnicist".; I suppose that doesn't have the same impact, so they continue to use "racist". You also have black rappers and black comedians that are racist, prejudice, etc., wear white face, etc.. Dave Chappelle does that. Nobody talks about that!! And everyone loves and support them. Is it because he's black? Is it only cool and okay if black people do it? Then that is racist.
Another argument I hear is "oh it's like this meme I saw where someone has a scratch on their leg and someone else has a broken leg and people pay attention to the scratch on the leg when you need to pay attention to the broken leg so we need to pay attention to the broken leg because black lives matter". Then, since white people are so neglected, we need to not pay attention to black people, we need to pay attention to white people, because white lives matter. I suppose saying "all lives matter" and "all lives matter is not racist" would be out of the question.
"white lives matter" and "black lives matter" is the definition of racist in the context that is is judging by race. "all lives matter" is still called "racist", despite being the definition of not being racist, or any prejudice, since it does not judge by race, or anything. Irony FTW.
