>>61032937 https://bookreader.bandcamp.com/album/gopher-ep>album artwork. tacky and literal. seems you google image searched gopher and mspainted text on it
>song 1 gopherinstrumentation is bare minimum, not amazing performance either. lyrics are weak. vocal delivery is okay. composition 2/10 injected sample, again is tacky and literal
>song 2 the woodsgeneral MIDI sounds. again like the bare minimum of instrumentation but different this time i suppose.
vocal delivery is tacky. lyrics are absolute bullshit. i assure you no one likes this song.
>song 3 paul blartback to guitar. kinda droney open string style emo.
"tv remote" part is decently hint of song crafting... overall lyrical angle is really weak man, its like almost a comedy song but it falls short of that kind of song, no real punch lines or much of anything funny.
>song 4 the crab kingyes you do have to cut the string ends off :)
same complaints as paul blart. open stringy weak composition lyrical angle etc not funny etc
>song 5 your closest attempt to decent music but even then its a little kitschy and mostly bland. story song that is neither an interesting story nor a great song. BUT I'll admit the lyrical phrasing fits and composition is at least not so drab and droney...
>overall: vocal delivery is not completely awful, and you have enough guitar skills that you can start experimenting with more chords or keychanges stuff like that get better at writing songs. just get better at writing songs or telling jokes. no one knows what to do with it if youre not going to be good at either one of those.
I am
>>61029486 and would appreciate any feedback! thx