Quoted By: >>92533575
Rolling Stone Magazine and others for decades have put forth the claim that the period from Buddy Holly's death to the Beatles' first US tour was a blank void where nothing important happened except a couple of shitty teen idols named Bobby so-and-so. This is all in spite of the Kingston Trio, Peter, Paul, and Mary, early Dylan, Neil Sedaka, the Shirelles, Roy Orbison, surf rock, Del Shannon, Hank Ballard, the Four Seasons, and many others.
Sure, most people prefer 1965 and up but is there a reason the first half of the 60s gets overlooked in rock histories so much?
Sure, most people prefer 1965 and up but is there a reason the first half of the 60s gets overlooked in rock histories so much?