>>63103902No, it's not a flaw of all D&D. It could happen in Pathfinder, too. But not in earlier editions. 4e is special because it took the 1/day nonsense and made it the CORE of the system. 5e still has this issue to a lesser extent. 4e embraced it the most, and thus it is the strongest offender.
>There isn't, because if the story said push on, you should push on.No, we shouldn't have, because we needed those abilities. It doesn't matter if we had "most of our capabilities", we did not have the daily powers which were important to our success.
> The 15 minute workday makes even less sense in 4e than it did in 3.5. Except we never did that. We had used up those abilities over multiple encounters, as the game intends.
> 4e's mechanics are perfectly consistent with the narrative it wants to tell- A team of mighty heroes going through trials and tribulations, worn down but still potent. Every edition does that. Only 4e so thoroughly engages with the idea of arbitrary once-per-day abilities.
>You are a dishonest shithead whose group actively took actions disincentivized by the system, and blamed the game for it. You and your group are That Guy.AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
IT IS ENTIRELY INCENTIVIZED BY THE SYSTEM YOU STUPID FUCKING MORON.
So a wizard in 3.5 who has no spell slots left should attack the BBEG because the story says he should? You're so full of shit it's hilarious.
