>The quality of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-quality images and informative comments.

This is such loose wording and basically equates to "any thing the mods/janitors don't like." I don't see the point of this rule other than making it easy for mods to just ban whoever they want for posting something they dislike. Who decides what "quality" is? It's completely subjective and ill defined.

Hey moot, I've got a Romanian friend I met on /soc/ that can't post on 4chan anymore unless she buys a pass. I know this isn't a ban because otherwise she'd be redirected to 4chan.org/banned

She hasn't been spamming, and also claims some of her friends are unable to post as well. So explain, are you blocking all Romanians from posting on 4chan? If so, why?

I know 4chan is expensive to run, so as a way to raise money, moot started selling captcha passes. Something that I think might be a good idea to raise more money would be an official 4chan shop that would sell things like visors, hats, golf shirts, posters, etc. adorned with the one of the few things here that moot has the rights to, the 4chan logo. I personally would love to get a solid black visor with the 4 leaf logo on it. I'm not sure if 4chan has ever had a shop before, but I think this could be a decent way to raise some funds for the site. What do y'all think?

Daily reminder that moot is pro-/pol/.

Why? I just want an explanation to why.
I think a lot of other users would appreciate an answer as well.

How stable are each othe boards? I'll start a list with the ones that I think fit where.

Stable
>/trv/
>/lit/
>/tg/

Warning
>/tv/
>/int/
>/adv/

Failed
>/v/
>/pol/
>/b/

Can you still greentext in the middle of a sentence? If so, in which boards?

I remember the process being [greentext][/greentext], much like spoilers. But tried yesterday on /a/ and didn't work.

Old thread >>24194


Archive:
http://archive.foolz.us/q/thread/570/
http://archive.foolz.us/q/thread/4678/
http://archive.foolz.us/q/thread/7253/
http://archive.foolz.us/q/thread/11032/
http://archive.foolz.us/q/thread/27108/

Sticky aftermath and continued discussion on what's best for /jp/

I find that the average user has a surprisingly high propensity to get temp-bans with things related to "shitposting". Shitposting itself, replying to shitposting, promoting shitposting, etc.

I'd imagine that most of these bans are for the greater good and cleanliness of boards. However, these bans are generally short period, meaning that there is no appeal process. From this lack of appeal, the user must risk IP range bans if he wishes to garner information as to what happened, or must accept the penalty without further action.

Without a more definitive explanation of what defines involvement with shitposting, the system is wide open to corruption. Moderators, should they choose to do so, have the ability to issue this harrowing bans with little to no recourse possible for the abused party.

So, for the betterment of the forum, I make two queries.

One. What makes a shitpost?

Two, how do we close the potential clean moderation hole?

Anyone else getting 504 errors when posting?