>>2544521That might be the case, but then they are very inconsistent, because they leave up posts discussing the same thing and implying the same thing. As an example:
A: Imagine how tight she is.
B: I bet she has a tight cunny.
While A and B reply to the same post/picture, A stays up and B gets deleted and banned for GR3 (garbage outside of /b/).
I rather believe that they specifically target that word, because it's the favorite word of a couple of persistent ban evaders on /tv/, else they'd delete posts that imply or reference things that could be considered worse in the context that you have mentioned (e.g. I'd feed her my yogurt, she can taste my salty milk, I'd sex her). I also have to disagree that the word is being used outside of 4chan or spinoff chans in the same context as /tv/ adapted it.
Either they should treat references that qualify under what you've said consistently, or they should only delete posts that are actually violating GR1 and then ban these posters under GR1. Using the vague definition of GR3 to ban the use of a word is kind of childish in my opinion. The word has long established itself as part of the 4chan lingo. We are way past that point.