>>1931655>You want to be careful when using something as shallow as a bandwagon argument when discussing philosophyIt's not "bandwagoning," it's so you can have a deeper understanding of whatever you read.
>Looking into the Book of Mormon or Quotations from Mao Tse Tung could be equally if not more-so justified using the same argument. I haven't seen either of those pop up very often. Maybe I'm just not reading the same things as you. Not the Book of Mormon, but the typical bible I absolutely recommend for largely the same purpose.
>Bullying aside neechee is more of a pop-phil author who made topics covered by men previous to him more accessible to the laymanNot sure where you get this since he was one of the more radical philosophers who diverged from previous thought.
>I would only recommend him to someone interested in existentialism,Well if you want to read twentieth century literature, having a deeper knowledge of existentialism would be quite useful regardless of its level of refinement.
