>>84565096>Ioudaia derives from ioudaios (Jew), not the other way aroundCitation needed. The entire linguistic construct derives from the name of Judah, son of Jacob. You correctly place the kingdom of Judah in this context. The causal links are nowhere near as clearcut here as you're making them out to be.
>The Bible also explicitly states multiple times that He descended from the lineage of the kings of Judah.Your comprehension of my point is only marginally better than the atheist's. I'll be explicit: Depending on your linguistic framework (ie. definition of Jew), Jesus may or may not be a Jew. There are surely enough definitions (even in the 1st century AD) that you need to specify which exact definition you're working from.
Finally,
Titus 1:10-11: For there are many rebellious people, full of meaningless talk and deception, especially those of the circumcision group. They must be silenced, because they are disrupting whole households by teaching things they ought not to teach—and that for the sake of dishonest gain.
Revelation 2:9: I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Revelation 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
John 8:44, Jesus speaking to Pharisees: Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
We are advised to be aware of the religion of Antichrist, who say they are Jews and are not (because Christians are, see Romans 2:28-29) but are the Synagogue of Satan, the ideological descendents of the Pharisees. Talmud is their oral law.