>>85287785>Because they’ll still figure out a way to post on their phonesNot all of them. The way I see it, the majority of them wouldn't bother, even if they're capable of doing it.
Also, unless you are genuinely autistic, it should be obvious that "ban phoneposters" doesn't mean successfully getting rid of 100% of phoneposters. Just like most (if not all) of the rules currently in place can't be effectively enforced against 100% of offenders. It simply means taking measures to deter the ones who don't care enough about this site to evade them. Since most cattle nowadays browse the web on their phones, that's a large portion of the userbase.
>>85287894I know. What makes you think I don't want to get rid of /pol/ and /pol/ crossposters?