Quoted By: >>52965049 >>52965125
Here's a suggestion. Firefox should have Pocket integrated for people who want to use it, but the analytical services provided by Pocket can be disabled.
In fact, Mozilla did a horrible job at initially explaining why they included Pocket. First of all, they skipped over the standard rules of Beta release, and pushed Pocket on to it. Apparently a lot of Mozillians had no idea it was coming either, even though Mozilla says early on they asked some Mozillians about what they thought of the Pocket privacy policy and if it needs changes (which btw it is terrible).
Mozilla integrated Pocket because they needed a quick way to improve Firefox's reading list, and a read it later integrated with Firefox Sync.
https://getpocket.com/privacy
>In addition to the methods described above, we may also collect information using cookies or other technologies. You may decline our cookies if your browser permits, although in that case you may not be able to use certain features, you may be required to enter your password more frequently during a session, and you may be unable to install or use certain Pocket Technologies. Cookies and other technologies make our Pocket Technologies easier to use and help us customize and personalize the services we provide based on your interests and activities.
This is contrary to the introduction of Firefox's integration with Disconnect.me.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/tracking-protection-pbm
>By default, Private Browsing with Tracking Protection uses the Disconnect.me basic protection list.
I shouldn't have to enter Private Browsing so to make my browser safe from itself. I don't even know if Disconnect.me will remove those Pocket cookies. I already use the Disconnect.me add-on, but I still don't know if that is good enough.
If you aren't aware, those cookies seem to act the same as Facebook tracking cookies, which track you across webpages, as long as there are "social media" plugins (like buttons).
In fact, Mozilla did a horrible job at initially explaining why they included Pocket. First of all, they skipped over the standard rules of Beta release, and pushed Pocket on to it. Apparently a lot of Mozillians had no idea it was coming either, even though Mozilla says early on they asked some Mozillians about what they thought of the Pocket privacy policy and if it needs changes (which btw it is terrible).
Mozilla integrated Pocket because they needed a quick way to improve Firefox's reading list, and a read it later integrated with Firefox Sync.
https://getpocket.com/privacy
>In addition to the methods described above, we may also collect information using cookies or other technologies. You may decline our cookies if your browser permits, although in that case you may not be able to use certain features, you may be required to enter your password more frequently during a session, and you may be unable to install or use certain Pocket Technologies. Cookies and other technologies make our Pocket Technologies easier to use and help us customize and personalize the services we provide based on your interests and activities.
This is contrary to the introduction of Firefox's integration with Disconnect.me.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/tracking-protection-pbm
>By default, Private Browsing with Tracking Protection uses the Disconnect.me basic protection list.
I shouldn't have to enter Private Browsing so to make my browser safe from itself. I don't even know if Disconnect.me will remove those Pocket cookies. I already use the Disconnect.me add-on, but I still don't know if that is good enough.
If you aren't aware, those cookies seem to act the same as Facebook tracking cookies, which track you across webpages, as long as there are "social media" plugins (like buttons).