>>32347774>No, you obviously don't understand how I function, otherwise you wouldn't be attempting your elitist bullshit.You only perceive it as elitist because you're indulging in stupid ass practices.
>It takes nothing awayIt takes away the absence of visual noise
>and adds "something" that helpsYeah, help you waste time looking at a list of tiny dots with blotches, which you then parse mentally, connecting the shape of the blotches with the code layout you need to memorize, then you click or whatever you do with it to either jump to the code to manipulate the breakpoints, if that's your goal, who knows, maybe you just wanna know where they are so you know where they are right now.
I mean, I can see why you might only want to see them, its to keep your code to blotch mapping in memory.
Anyway, you click it or whatnot and then you get brought to the actual bits of code where you can fuck with the breakpoint.
Instead of, if you really need to click, use the breakpoint panel, which has contextual information, directly.
Also, iirc, VS has shortcuts that jump to next and previous breakpoints.
>just another way of claiming your superiorityAgain, you wouldn't even be able to perceive things this way if I'd just be talking bullshit and you wouldn't just been doing your rationalization thing.