>>98533157>ethically != behaving morallyethically society says
>hurr durr don't fuck kids& for gud reason - informed consent. The same reason zoophilia is 'frowned upon' - if the other party cannot give consent or informed consent it's [statutory] rape .
morally (esp here for eg.) you'll find people quite happy to have a wank to pics/vids of children. Now that may not be your cup of tea but as long as it doesn't involve another party (other than the child whose pics were taken with or without parental permission)
then what does it do?
To deny it is denying that persons rights of self expression and sexual freedom.
Using visual aids is probably a bad example - even drawn, & that's a whole other argument.
end of the day: at what points does
>what a consenting adult does in the privacy of their bedroombecome a crime? If for eg I masturbate to my imagined scene of a young boy getting anally knotted by a dog - am I guilty of a crime.
ftr: married straight bloke who abhors the idea of sex with children and teenagers (hebe) only slightly less than the idea that committing a thought crime should be punishable. I am being devils advocate here.