>>34679614Bro, it doesn't matter whether a megacorporation does it on purpose in order to please parents or not. Like now, classic cartoons like Popeye, Buggs Bunny and whatever weren't made out of sheer love for art and free speech. Those artists had corporate breathing down their necks and weren't making anything even remotely anti-PC for their time. The fact that they didn't tend to have moral lessons like today is a moot point. Cartoons always sociated kids to the social mores of the time.
Now I don't know whether you're raging just against the socjus insanity and all those cases which get thrown around all over the place, or whether you actually have a problem with the underlying event which is vastly bigger than the clownhaired nutcases, which is the constant, inevitable and slow progress of society. If the former, then it's a sane attitude, there are absurdities taking place. If the latter, you're a nigger cuck faggot. Either way, by attacking this entire cultural shift instead of just the morbid manifestations, you're hotpocketing for the very people who not only profit from, but who actually set in motion, what you're raging against. And I don't mean jews. They promote the endless economic growth they want, something which they know necessarily entails incessant social changes, while capitalizing on the discontent generated by those changes he enabled.
Ultimately like complaining about some 60s cartoon promoting race-mixing. Pointing at how non-white countries are poor would be "evidence" that we shouldn't let miscigenation go too far. Publicizing real and false cases of biracial couples which ended violently would be the consequences of forced integration. Get it? You might be serving interests you don't even know exist, which use specific social ills (which can be real or false) as a dangling carrot to make you, ultimately, argue against something which is, simply put, civilized behavior.
